Casino guide › Table games

Table games: where the house edge is actually decided

Two tables that look identical can differ as much as two separate games. The difference is not luck. It is a few lines in the rules.

Roulette: the zero is the whole story

The house edge in roulette comes from exactly one place — the zero pockets. A European wheel has one zero, an American wheel has two, and that single difference roughly doubles the advantage the house holds over the same game with the same bets.

There is a third case worth recognising: a table running French rules, where a zero returns half of the even-money bets (red/black, odd/even) or holds them “in prison” for the next spin. That measurably improves the ratio in the player's favour — and it does so on precisely the bets beginners place most often.

What nothing changes: the house edge on a single number and on an even-money bet is the same. Strategies built on switching between fields do not alter that ratio at all. They only alter the swings.

Blackjack: the payout is the first question

Blackjack is the casino game where your decisions genuinely matter — but only within what the rules permit. Before any talk of strategy, one number overrides everything else: what a blackjack pays. A table paying 6:5 instead of the traditional 3:2 offers a measurably worse deal on the same game with the same skill, and no amount of correct play brings that back.

The rest follow: how many decks are dealt, whether the dealer stands or draws on a soft 17, whether you can double after a split, how many times a pair can be split, and whether surrender is offered. Each moves the edge by a few tenths of a percent, and together they add up to something that is not small.

Insurance is its own case: a losing bet over the long run regardless of what you are holding. It is not offered every single time by accident.

Baccarat: simple rules, transparent ratios

Baccarat is interesting because it contains almost no decisions — the draws follow a fixed rule, and the player only chooses what to back. That makes the ratios unusually transparent. Betting the banker side carries a slightly smaller house edge than betting the player side, which is exactly why a commission is deducted from it.

The tie bet, by contrast, works with a substantially larger edge no matter how attractive its payout looks. It is this game's side bet: eye-catching, and mathematically the most expensive choice at the table.

Side bets in general

Almost every table game offers extras: pairs at blackjack, neighbouring numbers at roulette, assorted bonus combinations. With very few exceptions these run at a higher house edge than the base game.

The point is not that they are forbidden. It is that someone who sat down for the base game's better ratios and then adds a side bet every round is no longer playing the game they planned to play.

What to check before you sit down

• Roulette: how many zeros are on the wheel, and whether a zero rule applies.
• Blackjack: whether the payout is 3:2 or 6:5.
• Baccarat: the size of the commission on the banker side.
• Everywhere: the table minimum, measured against your own balance.

All four sit on the table's information panel and take half a minute to read. Most “bad evenings” actually begin at a badly chosen table, not at a bad round.

Live table or software table

The same game runs two ways. In the software version a random number generator produces the outcome, you set the pace, and the minimum stake is typically lower. At a live table a real dealer works in a studio, the dealer sets the pace, and the minimum is higher.

In terms of house edge there is no difference in principle: the rules determine it, not the method of delivery. In practice there is one that matters a great deal — a software table fits several times as many rounds into an hour. If the mathematics is identical, more rounds simply means the edge applies more often.

So anyone who wants to play more slowly is better served by the live table, provided the higher minimum fits their balance. Those two factors pull in opposite directions, and it is worth deciding deliberately which one matters more to you.

Stake sizing at the table

Stake size is a sharper question at table games than on slots, because the rounds are slower and larger. Two simple rules help.

First: the table minimum should be no more than a fiftieth to a seventieth of your balance. If your evening's balance is twenty times the minimum, a few bad rounds will end it — not because you were unlucky, but because ordinary variance disposes of a balance that size easily.

Second: the stake should not follow the result. Not because progressive staking is mathematically worse — the overall expected value is unchanged — but because a decision made straight after a result is not made with a cool head. It is the same error the “systems” rely on.